Difference between revisions of "Fretting fatigue case"

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Mehless Method implementation
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Jureslak moved page FWO case to Fretting fatigue case)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Box-round|title= Related papers |
 +
[https://e6.ijs.si/ParallelAndDistributedSystems/publications/32424999.pdf G. Kosec, J. Slak, M. Depolli, R. Trobec, K. Pereira, S. Tomar, T. Jacquemin, S. Bordas, M. Wahab; Weak and strong from meshless methods for linear elastic problem under fretting contact conditions, Tribology international, vol. 138, 2019]
 +
 +
[https://e6.ijs.si/ParallelAndDistributedSystems/publications/32230439.pdf J. Slak, G. Kosec; Adaptive radial basis function-generated finite differences method for contact problems, International journal for numerical methods in engineering, vol. 119, 2019 [DOI: 10.1002/nme.6067]]
 +
}}
 +
 +
__TOC__
 +
 
Click on [[Solid Mechanics]] to go back.
 
Click on [[Solid Mechanics]] to go back.
  

Latest revision as of 16:36, 5 December 2022

edit 

Related papers

G. Kosec, J. Slak, M. Depolli, R. Trobec, K. Pereira, S. Tomar, T. Jacquemin, S. Bordas, M. Wahab; Weak and strong from meshless methods for linear elastic problem under fretting contact conditions, Tribology international, vol. 138, 2019

J. Slak, G. Kosec; Adaptive radial basis function-generated finite differences method for contact problems, International journal for numerical methods in engineering, vol. 119, 2019 [DOI: 10.1002/nme.6067]


Click on Solid Mechanics to go back.

Theoretical introdution

This case is an extension of the classical Hertzian contact, as defined in Pereira et al. (2016) [1] and described in detail in Hojjati-Talemi et al. (2014) [2]

It is considered within the Multi-analysis of fretting fatigue using physical and virtual experiments project

Contact of cylinders under partial slip

This extends the classical theory of Hertzian contact with a tangential force $Q$. When the tangential force is less than the limiting force of friction, i.e., \[|Q| < \mu P,\] where $\mu$ is the coefficent of friction, sliding motion will not occur but the contact will be divided into regions of slip and stick zones that are unknown a priori. For the case of cylinders the analysis is given in Hills & Nowell (1994), p. 44.

Besides the normal traction $p(x)$ we know have an additional shear traction given by \begin{equation} q(x) = \begin{cases} -\mu p_0 \sqrt{1 - \frac{x^2}{b^2}}, & c \leq |x| \leq b \\ -\mu p_0 \left(\sqrt{1 - \frac{x^2}{b^2}} - \frac{c}{b}\sqrt{1 - \frac{x^2}{c^2}}\right), & |x| < c \end{cases} \end{equation} where $b$ is the half-width of the whole contact, and $c$ the half-width of the central sticking region. The width of the central zone, i.e. the value of dimension $c$ is dependent on the applied tangential force $Q$: \begin{equation} \frac{c}{b} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{Q}{\mu P}} \end{equation}

The distributions $q(x)$ and $p(x)$ as well as the widths of the stick and slip zones can be seen in the image below. Screenshot 2016-11-17 10-43-18.png

The effect of bulk stress

Additionally we might be interested in the addition of bulk stress $\sigma_{\textrm{ax}}$. This type of stress occurs in fretting fatique experiments like the one shown below [1].

Screenshot 20171003 082633.png

The previous solution for contact of cylinders under partial slip can be adjusted for the presence of bulk stresses $\sigma_\mathrm{ax}$. These cause an eccentricity $e$ to the solution given above. The shear traction $q(x)$ can be written as: \begin{equation} q(x) = \begin{cases} -\mu p_0 \sqrt{1 - \frac{x^2}{b^2}}, \quad c \leq | x - e | \text{ and } |x| \leq b \\ -\mu p_0 \left[\sqrt{1 - \frac{x^2}{b^2}} - \frac{c}{b}\sqrt{1 - \frac{(x-e)^2}{c^2}}\right], \quad |x-e| < c \end{cases} \end{equation} where once again \[ \frac{c}{b} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{Q}{\mu F}}\] and \begin{equation} e = \frac{b \sigma_\mathrm{ax}}{4 \mu p_0}. \end{equation} If larger values of $\sigma_\mathrm{ax}$ are applied, one edge of the stick zone will approach the edge of the contact ($e$ becomes larger). The solution for the shear stress traction is therefore only valid if $e + c \leq b$, i. e. \[\frac{\sigma_\mathrm{ax}}{\mu p_0} \leq 4\left(1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{Q}{\mu F}}\right).\]

MLSM numerical solution for FWO case

We replicate the numerical solution described in Pereira et al. (2016) [1]

Case definition

We are solving the equation $$(\lambda + \mu) \nabla (\nabla \cdot \b{u}) + \mu \nabla^2 \b{u} = 0$$ on the domain $D = [-L/2, L/2] \times [-W/2, 0]$. Componentwise $\b{u} = [u; v]$. The boundary conditions are:

  • top: $\vec{t}(x) = (q(x), -p(x))$ or componentwise $\mu \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}(x, 0) + \mu \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}(x, 0) = q(x)$ and $(2 \mu+\lambda) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x, 0) + \lambda \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}(x, 0) = -p(x)$ .
  • left: $\b{u} = 0$ or componentwise $u(-L/2, y) = v(-L/2, y) = 0$.
  • bottom: up-down symmetry conditions: componentwise $\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}(x, -W/2) = 0, v(x, -W/2) = 0$.
  • right: this part has traction $\sigma_{ax}$, ie. $\vec{t}(y) = \sigma_{ax}\vec{\imath}$ or componentwise $(2 \mu+\lambda) \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}(L/2, y) + \lambda \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(L/2, y) = 0$ and $\mu \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}(L/2, y) + \mu \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}(L/2, y) = \sigma_{ax}$.

Illustration of the computational domain is presented below.

Fwo bc.png


Phsyical parameters

Basic parameters are:

  • $E = \unit{72.1}{GPa}$, Youngs modulus
  • $\nu = 0.33$, Poissons ratio
  • $L = \unit{40}{mm}$, length of the pad
  • $W = \unit{10}{mm}$, width of the pad
  • $t = \unit{4}{mm}$, thickness of the pad
  • $\sigma_{ax} = \unit{100}{MPa}$, axial pressure
  • $F = \unit{543}{N}$, normal force
  • $Q = \unit{155}{N}$, tangential force
  • $R = \unit{10}{mm}$ or $\unit{50}{mm}$, raduis of curvature of the cylindrical pad
  • $COF = \mu = 0.3$ or $0.85$ or $2$, coefficient of friction

Derived parameters are, for choice of $R = \unit{10}{mm}$ and $\mu = 0.3$:

  • $E^\ast = \frac{E}{2(1-\nu^2)} = \unit{40.4}{GPa}$, combined Young's modulus
  • $p_{max} = p_0 = \sqrt{\frac{FE^\ast}{t R \pi}} = \unit{418.10407}{MPa}$, maximal normal pressure
  • $a = 2 \sqrt{\frac{FR}{t E^\ast \pi}} = \unit{0.2067}{mm}$, semi contact width, contact region is $[-a, a] \times \{0\}$
  • $c = a \sqrt{1 - \frac{Q}{\mu F}} = \unit{0.04504}{mm}$, stick zone semi width
  • $e = \frac{a \sigma_{ax}}{4 \mu p_{max}} = \unit{0.041197}{mm}$, eccentricity due to axial load

Numerical solution

Comparison of this solution against FEM solution published in Pereira et al. (2016) is presented below.

Fwo cases1.png

Meshes for this plot: File:fwo_meshes.zip

Data for this plot: File:fwo_cases_plotdata.mat

Script for this plot: File:plot_fwo_cases.m

For faster testing, smaller meshes and corresponding solutions are presented below:

Fwo cases small mesh.png

Meshes for this plot: File:fwo_small_meshes.zip

Data for this plot: File:fwo_cases_small_mesh_plodata.mat

Script is the same as above.


A contour plot of von Mises stress in the specimen for the case $\mu = 0.65, R = 50$ is presented below. Countour plots for all cases look similar.

Fwo solution.png

Note that contour of stress are similar to the ones in Hertzian contact above, but a significant concentracion of stresses under the contact area is present.

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 K. Pereira et al., On the convergence of stresses in fretting fatigue, Materials 9(8) (2016), doi:10.3390/ma9080639
  2. ↑ R. Hojjati-Talemi, M. A. Wahab in dr., Prediction of fretting fatigue crack initiation and propagation lifetime for cylindrical contact configuration, Tribol. Int. 76 (2014) 73–91, doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2014.02.017.