Toggle menu
71
399
28
3.6K
Medusa: Coordinate Free Meshless Method implementation
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Solving sparse systems: Difference between revisions

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Meshless Method implementation
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


Solving a simple sparse system $A x = b$ for steady space of heat equation in 1d with $n$ nodes, results in a matrix like this:
Solving a simple sparse system $A x = b$ for steady space of heat equation in 1d with $n$ nodes, results in a matrix like this:
[[File:matrix.png|400px]]
[[File:matrix.png|300px]]


The following timings of solvers are given in seconds:
The following timings of solvers are given in seconds:

Revision as of 12:05, 16 March 2017

There are many methods available for solving sparse systems. We compare some of them here.

Mathematica has the following methods available (https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/LinearSolve.html#DetailsAndOptions)

  • direct: banded, cholesky, multifrontal (direct sparse LU)
  • iterative: Krylov

Matlab has the following methods:

Eigen has the following methods: (https://eigen.tuxfamily.org/dox-devel/group__TopicSparseSystems.html)

  • direct: sparse LU
  • iterative: bicgstab, cg

Solving a simple sparse system $A x = b$ for steady space of heat equation in 1d with $n$ nodes, results in a matrix like this:

The following timings of solvers are given in seconds:

$n = 10^6$ Matlab Mathematica Eigen
Banded 0.16 0.28 0.04
SparseLU / 1.73 0.82
BICGStab / Krylov 0.33 0.39 0.53

Incomplete LU preconditioner was used for BICGStab. Without the preconditioner BICGStab does not converge.