Difference between revisions of "Radial basis function-generated finite differences (RBF-FD)"

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Mehless Method implementation
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This page describes the computation of RBF-FD weight augmented with polynomials. See also [[Computation of shape functions]] and [[Meshless Local Strong Form Method (MLSM)]] for a more general discussion.
 
This page describes the computation of RBF-FD weight augmented with polynomials. See also [[Computation of shape functions]] and [[Meshless Local Strong Form Method (MLSM)]] for a more general discussion.
 +
 +
== RBF-FD ==
 +
$
 +
\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}
 +
\newcommand{\T}{\mathsf{T}}
 +
\renewcommand{\L}{\mathcal{L}}
 +
\renewcommand{\b}{\boldsymbol}
 +
\newcommand{\n}{\b{n}}
 +
\newcommand{\x}{\b{x}}
 +
\newcommand{\w}{\b{w}}
 +
\newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}
 +
\newcommand{\lap}{\nabla^2}
 +
\newcommand{\dpar}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}
 +
$
 +
 
Approximations of partial differential operators are the core
 
Approximations of partial differential operators are the core
 
of strong form meshless procedures. Consider a partial differential operator $\L$
 
of strong form meshless procedures. Consider a partial differential operator $\L$
Line 58: Line 73:
 
studied and out of scope of this work~\cite{wendland2004scattered}.
 
studied and out of scope of this work~\cite{wendland2004scattered}.
  
\subsection{Monomial augmentation}
+
== Monomial augmentation ==
\label{sec:aug}
 
 
Using approximations that only contain RBF can lead to stability issues with
 
Using approximations that only contain RBF can lead to stability issues with
 
conditioning under refinement or failure to converge due to stagnation errors~\cite{flyer2016role}.
 
conditioning under refinement or failure to converge due to stagnation errors~\cite{flyer2016role}.

Revision as of 15:06, 27 June 2019

This page describes the computation of RBF-FD weight augmented with polynomials. See also Computation of shape functions and Meshless Local Strong Form Method (MLSM) for a more general discussion.

RBF-FD

$ \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\T}{\mathsf{T}} \renewcommand{\L}{\mathcal{L}} \renewcommand{\b}{\boldsymbol} \newcommand{\n}{\b{n}} \newcommand{\x}{\b{x}} \newcommand{\w}{\b{w}} \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon} \newcommand{\lap}{\nabla^2} \newcommand{\dpar}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}} $

Approximations of partial differential operators are the core of strong form meshless procedures. Consider a partial differential operator $\L$ at a point $\x_c$. Approximation of $\L$ at a point $\x_c$ is sought using an ansatz \begin{equation} \label{eq:approx} (\L u)(\x_c) \approx \sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i u(\x_i). \end{equation} Here $\x_i$ are the neighboring nodes of $\x_c$ which constitute its \emph{stencil}, $w_i$ are called \emph{stencil weights}, $n$ is the \emph{stencil size} and $u$ is an arbitrary function.

This form of approximation is desirable, since operator $\L$ at point $\x_c$ is approximated by a linear functional $\w_\L (\x_c)$, assembled of weights $\w_i$ \begin{equation} \label{eq:approx-vec} \L|_{\x_c} \approx \w_\L (\x_c)^\T \end{equation} and the approximation is obtained using just a dot product with the function values in neighboring nodes. The dependence of $\w_\L (\x_c)$ on $\L$ and $\x_c$ is often omitted and written simply as $\w$.

To determine the unknown weights $\w$, equality of~\eqref{eq:approx} is enforced for a given set of functions. A natural choice are monomials, which are also used in FDM, resulting in the Finite Point Method~\cite{onate2001finite}.

In the RBF-FD discretization the equality is satisfied for radial basis functions $\phi_j$. Each $\phi_j$, for $j = 1, \ldots, n$ corresponds to one linear equation \begin{equation} \sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i \phi_j (\x_i) = (\L \phi_j)(\x_c) \end{equation} for unknowns $w_i$. Assembling these $n$ equations for into matrix form, we obtain the following linear system: \begin{equation} \label{eq:rbf-system} \begin{bmatrix} \phi(\|\x_1 - \x_1\|) &\cdots & \phi(\|\x_n - \x_1\|) \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \phi(\|\x_1 - \x_n\|) &\cdots & \phi(\|\x_n - \x_n\|) \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} w_1 \\ \vdots \\ w_n \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} (\L\phi(\|\x-\x_1\|))|_{\x=\x_c} \\ \vdots \\ (\L\phi(\|\x-\x_n\|))|_{\x=\x_c} \\ \end{bmatrix}, \end{equation} where $\phi_j$ have been expanded for clarity. The above system will be written more compactly as \begin{equation} \label{eq:rbf-system-c} A \w = \b \ell_\phi. \end{equation} The matrix $A$ is symmetric, and for some $\phi$ even positive definite. This and other approximation properties of RBFs are well studied and out of scope of this work~\cite{wendland2004scattered}.

Monomial augmentation

Using approximations that only contain RBF can lead to stability issues with conditioning under refinement or failure to converge due to stagnation errors~\cite{flyer2016role}. To improve accuracy and convergence, the approximation from section~\ref{sec:rbffd} can be augmented with polynomials.

Let $p_1, \ldots, p_s$ be polynomials forming the basis of the space of $d$-dimensional multivariate polynomials up to and including total degree $m$, with $s = \binom{m+d}{d}$.

Since enforcing exactness of~\eqref{eq:approx} for additional function would result in an overdetermined system, these additional constraints are enforced by extending~\eqref{eq:rbf-system-c} as \begin{equation} \label{eq:rbf-system-aug} \begin{bmatrix} A & P \\ P^\T & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \w \\ \b \lambda \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \b \ell_{\phi} \\ \b \ell_{p} \end{bmatrix}\!\!,\ P = \begin{bmatrix} p_1(\x_1) & \cdots & p_s(\x_1) \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ p_1(\x_n) & \cdots & p_s(\x_n) \\ \end{bmatrix}\!\!,\ \b \ell_p = \begin{bmatrix} (\L p_1)|_{\x=\x_c} \\ \vdots \\ (\L p_s)|_{\x=\x_c} \\ \end{bmatrix} \end{equation} where $P$ is a $n \times s$ matrix of polynomials evaluated at stencil nodes and $\b \ell_p$ is the vector of values assembled by applying considered operator $\L$ to the polynomials at $\x_c$.

Note that the equation $P^\T \w = \b \ell_p$ contains exactly exactness constraints for $p_j$. However, the introduction of parameters $\lambda_j$ causes~\eqref{eq:approx} to not be exact for $\phi_i$ anymore. In fact, is was shown~\cite{flyer2016role} to be equivalent to the following constrained minimisation problem \begin{equation} \min_{\w} \left(\frac{1}{2} \w^\T A \w - \w^\T \b \ell_{\phi}\right), \text{ subject to } P^\T \b w = \ell_{p} \end{equation} and parameters $\b \lambda$ can be interpreted as Lagrangian multipliers.

Weights obtained by solving~\eqref{eq:rbf-system-aug} are taken as approximations of $\L$ at $\x_c$, while values $\b \lambda$ are discarded.