Difference between revisions of "Lid driven cavity"

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Mehless Method implementation
Jump to: navigation, search
(Results)
(Results)
Line 34: Line 34:
  
  
<figure id="fig:lid_driven_Re100">
+
[[File:lid_driven_explicit_exec_time.png|600px]][[File:lid_driven_explicit_convergence.png|600px]]
[[File:lid_driven_contour_Re100.png|600px]]
 
<caption>Velocity magnitude contour plot</caption>
 
</figure>
 
 
 
<figure id="fig:lid_driven_Re3200">
 
[[File:lid_driven_contour_Re3200.png|600px]]
 
<caption>Velocity magnitude contour plot</caption>
 
</figure>
 
 
 
 
 
<figure id="fig:lid_driven_exec_time">
 
[[File:lid_driven_explicit_exec_time.png|600px]]
 
<caption>Execution time for Re = 100 case</caption>
 
</figure>
 
 
 
<figure id="fig:lid_driven_convergence">
 
[[File:lid_driven_explicit_convergence.png|600px]]
 
<caption>Convergence for Re = 100 case</caption>
 
</figure>
 
  
  

Revision as of 19:55, 22 October 2017

Intro

back to Fluid Mechanics

Let's try MLSM and described solution procedures first on a lid driven cavity problem that stands for a standard benchmark test for validation of the fluid flow solvers. It has been proposed in 1982 and since then solved by many researchers with wide spectra of different numerical methods. The test is still widely studied and used for validation of novel methods and numerical principles. Case is schematically presented in Figure 1 followed by few basic analyses, just to show that things work as they should. Details about comparison can be found in paper

FF .png Figure 1: Scheme of a lid driven cavity case

Code

The snippet of the MLSM code for an explicit ACM method with CBS looks like: (full examples, including implicit versions, can be found under the examples in the code repository Main Page).

 1     for (int step = 0; step <=O.t_steps; ++step) {
 2         // Navier-Stokes
 3         for (auto i:interior) 
 4             // Navier-Stokes
 5             v2[c] = v1[c] + O.dt * ( - 1/O.rho    * op.grad(P1,c)
 6                                      + O.mu/O.rho * op.lap(v1, c)
 7                                      -              op.grad(v1,c)*v1[c]);
 8         }
 9         // Mass continuity
10         for (auto i:interior) { 
11             P2[i] = P1[i] - O.dl * O.dt * O.rho * op.div(v2,i) + O.dl2 * O.dl * O.dt * O.dt * op.lap(P1,i);
12         }
13         v1.swap(v2);
14         P1.swap(P2);
15     }

Results

Lid driven contour Re3200.pngLid driven contour Re100.png


Lid driven explicit exec time.pngLid driven explicit convergence.png


Lid driven comparison.png Figure 2: Cross section velocity profiles.