Difference between revisions of "Convection Diffusion equation"

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Mehless Method implementation
Jump to: navigation, search
(Time dependent 2D case)
(References)
 
(78 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Before moving to more complex numerical examples, preliminary tests are done on a case with a known closed form solution. As in all the previous examples, we use the diffusion equation for a test case. The main purpose of this section is basic evaluation of mesh based against meshless methods, as well as strong form against weak form methods. More specific analyses and performance tests are presented in Chapter \ref{cases}.  
+
Before moving to more complex numerical examples we solve the convection diffusion equation in different regimes.  
 
\section{Diffusion equation}
 
 
 
\index{Diffusion equation}
 
 
A 2D diffusion equation in its dimensionless form is considered:
 
A 2D diffusion equation in its dimensionless form is considered:
\begin{align} %??? brezdimenzijska oblika nima c
+
\begin{align}  
\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} - \nabla^2u = q, & \qquad (x, y)\in \Omega, \label{eq.diffu}\\
+
\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} - \alpha \nabla^2u + \b{v}\cdot \nabla u = q, & \qquad (x, y)\in \Omega, \label{eq.diffu}\\
% \frac{\partial u(x,y,t)}{\partial t}  = \nabla^2 u(x,y,t), & \qquad (x, y)\in \Omega, \label{eq.diffusion}\\
 
 
u(x,y,t) = \overline{u}(x,y,t), & \qquad (x,y) \in \Gamma_D,\label{eq.bc_diffu}\\
 
u(x,y,t) = \overline{u}(x,y,t), & \qquad (x,y) \in \Gamma_D,\label{eq.bc_diffu}\\
 
       u(x,y,t),_n = \overline{g}(x,y,t), & \qquad (x,y) \in \Gamma_N, \label{eq.mixed.bc_diffu}\\
 
       u(x,y,t),_n = \overline{g}(x,y,t), & \qquad (x,y) \in \Gamma_N, \label{eq.mixed.bc_diffu}\\
Line 14: Line 9:
 
where  $(x,y)$ are spatial coordinates, $t$ is time, $u(x, y, t)$  is the unknown solution, $ \Omega$, and $ \Gamma_D$ and $ \Gamma_N$  are the global domain with Dirichlet boundary and Neumann boundary, $\overline{u}$ and $\overline{g}$  are the prescribed Dirichlet and Neumann boundary values and $u(x,y,0)=u_0$  is the known initial condition.
 
where  $(x,y)$ are spatial coordinates, $t$ is time, $u(x, y, t)$  is the unknown solution, $ \Omega$, and $ \Gamma_D$ and $ \Gamma_N$  are the global domain with Dirichlet boundary and Neumann boundary, $\overline{u}$ and $\overline{g}$  are the prescribed Dirichlet and Neumann boundary values and $u(x,y,0)=u_0$  is the known initial condition.
  
= Boring 1D case =
+
In following discussion we present some solutions and test we did while coding our library. Please refer to our [https://gitlab.com/e62Lab/e62numcodes '''repository'''] for full set of latest examples and tests
 +
 
 +
== Steady state 1D case ==
 
First, a simple one dimensional case is tackled to assess basic
 
First, a simple one dimensional case is tackled to assess basic
 
properties of presented solution method. Consider the problem
 
properties of presented solution method. Consider the problem
Line 35: Line 32:
 
\label{eq:linf-err}
 
\label{eq:linf-err}
 
\end{equation}
 
\end{equation}
where $X$ is the set of all points in the domain. The problem can be solved with below code.
+
where $X$ is the set of all points in the domain. The problem can be solved with below code. Note, that the code is the same for 1,2 and 3D cases
  
 
<syntaxhighlight lang="c++" line>
 
<syntaxhighlight lang="c++" line>
Line 46: Line 43:
 
VectorXd solution = M.lu().solve(rhs);
 
VectorXd solution = M.lu().solve(rhs);
 
</syntaxhighlight>
 
</syntaxhighlight>
[[File:1dDiffusionConv.JPG|600px]] [[File:1dDiffusionTime.JPG|640px]]
+
 
 +
[[File:1dDiffusionConv.JPG|500px]] [[File:1dDiffusionTime.JPG|540px]]
  
 
As expected, MLSM is slower due to computation of shape
 
As expected, MLSM is slower due to computation of shape
Line 54: Line 52:
 
are the same for all practical purposes.
 
are the same for all practical purposes.
  
= Time dependent 2D case =
+
== Time dependent 2D case ==
 
We solved the equation on a square $\Omega = [0, a] \times [0, a]$ with
 
We solved the equation on a square $\Omega = [0, a] \times [0, a]$ with
 
Dirichlet boundary conditions $ \left. u\right|_{\partial \Omega} = 0 $ and
 
Dirichlet boundary conditions $ \left. u\right|_{\partial \Omega} = 0 $ and
Line 64: Line 62:
 
m}{a}p_y\right) e^{-\frac{\pi^2 (n^2+m^2)}{a^2}t}  
 
m}{a}p_y\right) e^{-\frac{\pi^2 (n^2+m^2)}{a^2}t}  
 
\end{equation}
 
\end{equation}
Because the solution is
 
given in the series form, we only compare to the finite approximation, summing
 
to $N = 100$ instead of infinity. Solution is on <xr id="fig:square_heat"/>.
 
See the code for solving diffusion [https://gitlab.com/e62Lab/e62numcodes/blob/master/examples/diffusion/diffusion.cpp here].
 
  
[[File:square_heat.png|600 px]]
+
Temperature contour polot after $t = 0.05$ and convergence regarding the number of nodes
 
 
 
 
[[File:node_convergence.png|thumb|upright=2|center|alt=Graph of errors with respect to number of nodes|<caption>Convergence with respect to number of nodes</caption>]]
 
  
 +
[[File:square_heat.png|550 px]][[File:node_convergence_5.png|450 px]]
  
 
We tested the method with a fixed time step of $ \Delta t = 1\cdot 10^{-5}$
 
We tested the method with a fixed time step of $ \Delta t = 1\cdot 10^{-5}$
on a unit square ($a = 1$). Results are on <xr id="fig:node_convergence"/>.  Monomial basis of $6$ monomials was used and $12$
+
on a unit square ($a = 1$). Monomial basis of $6$ monomials was used and $12$
closest nodes counted as support for each node.  After more than $250$ nodes of
+
closest nodes counted as support for each node in one setup and in
 +
another 5 Guassians on 5 suport nodes.  After more than $250$ nodes of
 
discretization in each dimension the method diverges, which is expected. The
 
discretization in each dimension the method diverges, which is expected. The
 
stability criterion for diffusion equation in two dimensions is $\Delta t \leq
 
stability criterion for diffusion equation in two dimensions is $\Delta t \leq
Line 85: Line 78:
 
so our method is stable within the expected region.
 
so our method is stable within the expected region.
  
<figure id="fig:node_convergence_5">
+
Convergence with respect to number of time steps and comaprios between implicit and explicit solution
[[File:node_convergence_5.png|thumb|upright=2|center|<caption>Convergence with respect to number of nodes for Gaussian and Monomial basis</caption>]]
+
 
</figure>
+
[[File:timestep_convergence.png|500 px]][[File:explicit_implicit_diffusion_comparison_ver2.png|500 px]]
 +
 
 +
And 1/4 case, where we have mixed Neumann/Dirichlet boundary condition due to the symmetry together
 +
with some more weird domains, just to have some fun ...
 +
 
 +
[[File:quarter_diffusion.png|397px]][[File:poisson_weird1.png|397px]][[File:poisson_weird2.png|195px]]
 +
 
 +
== Convection Diffusion ==
 +
 
 +
The following example problem is adapted from [http://servidor.demec.ufpr.br/CFD/bibliografia/Ferziger%20Peric%20-%20Computational%20Methods%20for%20Fluid%20Dynamics,%203rd%20Ed%20-%202002.pdf Ferziger & Perič (2002) (pages 82-86)].
 +
 
 +
[[File:Screenshot_2016-11-28_11-05-03.png|400px]]
 +
 
 +
We now consider the problem of a scalar quantity transported in a known velocity field $\b{v}$. The velocity field is given by
 +
\[\b{u} = (u_x,u_y) = (x, -y),\]
 +
which represents the flow near a stagnation point $(x,y) = (0,0)$. The streamlines $xy=\mathrm{const.}$ and change direction with respect to the Cartesian grid. The convection-diffusion equation (also known as the scalar transport equation) is to be solved with the following boundary conditions:
 +
* $u = 0$ along the north (inlet) boundary;
 +
* linear variation $u= (1 - y)$ along the west boundary ($x = 0$);
 +
* symmetry condition on the south boundary;
 +
* zero gradient at the east (outlet) boundary.
 +
The parameter $\alpha$ is the diffusivity for the scalar quantity $u$. The problem and boundary conditions are schematically represented in below figure together with The solutions obtained by Ferziger and Perić.
 +
 
 +
[[File:Screenshot_2016-11-28_11-07-44.png|470px]] [[File:fvm_convection.png|600px]]
 +
 
 +
The meshless solution is obtained on regular point arrangements of sizes 100 × 100 and 300 × 300, for the 2 cases of diffusivity $\alpha = 0.01$ and $\alpha = 0.001$, respectively. For comparison we have plotted the contour lines at the same intervals as the original authors of this example. The basis functions are the 5 monomials $1$, $x$, $y$, $x^2$, $y^2$.
 +
 
 +
== Electrostatics Poisson's equation ==
 +
A special case of convection diffusion equation is also a Poisson's equation.
 +
Our next example is taken from the [http://www.freefem.org/ff++/ftp/freefem++doc.pdf FreeFem++ manual (page 235)].
 +
 
 +
Assuming there is no current and the charge distribution is time independent, the electric field $\b{E}$ satisfies
 +
\begin{equation}\label{eq:electrostatics}
 +
\b{\nabla}\cdot\b{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon}, \quad \b{\nabla} \times \b{E} = 0
 +
\end{equation}
 +
where $\rho$ is the charge density and $\epsilon$ is the permittivity. If we introduce an electrostatics potential $\phi$ such that
 +
\begin{equation}
 +
\b{E} = -\b{\nabla}\phi,
 +
\end{equation}
 +
we can insert it into the first equation in (\ref{eq:electrostatics}) resulting in Poisson's equation
 +
\begin{equation}\label{eq:poisson}
 +
\b{\nabla}^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\epsilon}.
 +
\end{equation}
 +
In the absence of unpaired electric charge equation (\ref{eq:poisson}) becomes Laplace's equation
 +
\begin{equation}
 +
\b{\nabla}^2 \phi = 0
 +
\end{equation}
 +
 
 +
We now solve this equation for a circular enclosure with two rectangular holes. The boundary of the circular enclosure is held at constant potential $0$ V. The two rectangular holes are held at constant potentials $+1$ V and $-1$ V, respectively.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[File:electrostatics.png|500px]]
 +
 
 +
== 3D cases ==
 +
 
 +
First, the behavior of the method is tested on the regular case. The equation $\nabla^2 u = -\pi^2 \sin(\pi x) \sin(\pi y) \sin(\pi z)$ is solved on domain $[0, 1/2]^3$,
 +
where sides with at least one coordinate 0 have Dirichet BCs $u = 0$ and other sides have Neumann conditions $\frac{\partial u}{\partial \vec{n}} = 0$. The convergence of MLSM in two different setups
 +
is shown below. Max error is taken for error measure.
 +
 
 +
[[File:pois3d_neu_poiss.png|500px]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
And few more 3D cases that are not part of any serious analysis and were made only for fun.
 +
 
 +
A 3-dimensional example, where a CAD model for aluminium heat sink is
 +
discretized to obtain the domain description.
 +
Heat equation with $\alpha = 9.7 \cdot 10^{-5}$, with no heat generation, i.e. $q = 0$, with Dirichlet boundary conditions
 +
$u = 100 ^\circ C$ on the bottom surface and
 +
$u = 20 ^\circ C$ everywhere else.
 +
 
 +
[[File:heat_sink_cad.png|440px]][[File:heat_sink_sol1.png|440px]][[File:heat_sink_sol2.png|175px]]
 +
 
 +
Next, example is simulation of baking Beef Wellington, where we followed the[https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/recipes/2538/beef-wellington recipe].
 +
The simple 3D model is discretized with 70490 points and simulated for one hour with 1 s time step.
 +
The initial temperature is set to 20 deg C, the oven temperature is set to 200 deg C. Heat diffusivity of beef is found in the [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1271/bbb.58.1942 literature], the dimensions are 34 x 14 x 9 cm.
 +
 
 +
[[File:beef_1.png|350px]][[File:beef_3.png|350px]][[File:beef_2.png|350px]]
 +
 
 +
And finally, steady state temperature profile of a triceratops and ... a box.
  
On <xr id="fig:node_convergence_5"/> is another image of convergence, this time using monomial basis $\{1, x,
+
[[File:triceratops.jpg|400px]][[File:diffusion3d.png|300px]]
y, x^2, y^2\}$ and Gaussian basis with discretization step $ \Delta t = 5
 
\cdot 10^{-6}$ and 5 support nodes. Total node count was $N = 2500$.
 
Error was calculated after $0.01$ time units have elapsed.
 
  
<figure id="fig:node_convergence_comparison">
+
'''We will add more serious 3D results as soon as we get motivated to prepare them, hopefully with some awesome project'''
[[File:explicit_implicit_diffusion_comparison_ver2.png|thumb|upright=2|center|<caption>Convergence with respect to number of nodes for explicit and implicit mixed boundary condition (Neumann is enforced in two different ways).</caption>]]
 
</figure>
 
  
Figure 4 shows convergence of 1/4 of the whole solution with Dirichlet boundary conditions (Fig. 1). The nodes were spanning the area $[0, a/2]^2$. As expected, higher number of nodes yields lower max error up to some maximal number of nodes. The latter is lower for explicit than for implicit method.
+
== References ==
==Convergence with respect to number of time steps==
+
* Trobec R., Kosec G., Šterk M., Šarler B., Comparison of local weak and strong form meshless methods for 2-D diffusion equation. Engineering analysis with boundary elements. 2012;36:310-321; [http://comms.ijs.si/~gkosec/data/papers/EABE2499.pdf manuscript]
<figure id="fig:timestep_convergence">
+
* robec R., Kosec G., Parallel Scientific Computing, ISBN: 978-3-319-17072-5 (Print) 978-3-319-17073-2.
[[File:timestep_convergence.png|thumb|upright=2|center|<caption>Convergence with respect to different timesteps</caption>]]
+
* Slak, J., Kosec, G.. Detection of heart rate variability from a wearable differential ECG device., MIPRO 2016, 39th International Convention, 2016, Opatija, Croatia, ISSN 1847-3938, pp 450-455.
</figure>
 
  
We tested the method on a fixed node count with different time steps on the same
+
'''This list might be incomplete, check also reference on the [[Medusa | Main Page]].'''
domain as above. Results are on <xr id="fig:timestep_convergence"/>. For large time steps the method diverges, but once it starts
 
converging the precision increases steadily as the time step decreases, until it
 
hits its lower limit. This behaviour is expected.  The error was calculated
 
against the analytical solution above after $0.005$ units of time have passed.  A
 
monomial basis up to order $2$ inclusive ($m = 6$) was used and the support
 
size was $n = 12$.
 

Latest revision as of 11:06, 9 July 2019

Before moving to more complex numerical examples we solve the convection diffusion equation in different regimes. A 2D diffusion equation in its dimensionless form is considered: \begin{align} \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} - \alpha \nabla^2u + \b{v}\cdot \nabla u = q, & \qquad (x, y)\in \Omega, \label{eq.diffu}\\ u(x,y,t) = \overline{u}(x,y,t), & \qquad (x,y) \in \Gamma_D,\label{eq.bc_diffu}\\ u(x,y,t),_n = \overline{g}(x,y,t), & \qquad (x,y) \in \Gamma_N, \label{eq.mixed.bc_diffu}\\ u(x,y,t) = u_0, & \qquad t=0,\label{eq.ic_diffu} \end{align} where $(x,y)$ are spatial coordinates, $t$ is time, $u(x, y, t)$ is the unknown solution, $ \Omega$, and $ \Gamma_D$ and $ \Gamma_N$ are the global domain with Dirichlet boundary and Neumann boundary, $\overline{u}$ and $\overline{g}$ are the prescribed Dirichlet and Neumann boundary values and $u(x,y,0)=u_0$ is the known initial condition.

In following discussion we present some solutions and test we did while coding our library. Please refer to our repository for full set of latest examples and tests

Steady state 1D case

First, a simple one dimensional case is tackled to assess basic properties of presented solution method. Consider the problem \begin{align} u''(x) &= \sin(x), \quad x \in (0, 1) \nonumber \\ u(0) &= 0 \label{eq:neu1d} \\ u'(1) &= 0 \nonumber \end{align} with analytical solution \begin{equation} u(x) = x \cos 1 - \sin x. \end{equation} We solve the problem with MLSM using 3 support nodes and 3 monomials $\{1, x, x^2\}$ as basis functions on a regularly distributed nodes. This setup of MLSM is theoretically equivalent to the Finite Difference Method (FDM) and therefore it is worth implementing also standard FDM to compare results and execution times. The error between the actual solution $u$ and the approximate solution $\hat{u}$ is measured in $\ell_\infty$ norm, \begin{equation} \|u - \hat{u}\|_{\ell_\infty} = \max_{x\in X} | u(x) - \hat{u}(x)|, \label{eq:linf-err} \end{equation} where $X$ is the set of all points in the domain. The problem can be solved with below code. Note, that the code is the same for 1,2 and 3D cases

1 for (int i : domain.internal()) {
2     op.lap(M, i, 1.0);  // Equation.
3     rhs(i) = std::sin(domain.positions[i][0]);
4 }
5 op.value(M, left, 1.0); // Left BC.
6 op.neumann(M, right, {1}, 1.0);  // Right BC.
7 VectorXd solution = M.lu().solve(rhs);

1dDiffusionConv.JPG 1dDiffusionTime.JPG

As expected, MLSM is slower due to computation of shape functions, which are known in advance in FDM. However, counting that as part of the preprocessing and measuring only the part equivalent to FDM, it can be seen that the execution times for FDM and MLSM are the same for all practical purposes.

Time dependent 2D case

We solved the equation on a square $\Omega = [0, a] \times [0, a]$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions $ \left. u\right|_{\partial \Omega} = 0 $ and initial state $ u(t = 0) = 1$. An analytical solution for this domain is known \begin{equation} u(\vec{p}, t) = \sum_{\substack{n=1 \\ n \text{ odd}}}^\infty\sum_{\substack{m=1 \\ m \text{ odd}}}^\infty \frac{1}{\pi^2} \frac{16 a^2}{nm} \sin\left(\frac{\pi n}{a}p_x\right) \sin\left(\frac{\pi m}{a}p_y\right) e^{-\frac{\pi^2 (n^2+m^2)}{a^2}t} \end{equation}

Temperature contour polot after $t = 0.05$ and convergence regarding the number of nodes

Square heat.pngNode convergence 5.png

We tested the method with a fixed time step of $ \Delta t = 1\cdot 10^{-5}$ on a unit square ($a = 1$). Monomial basis of $6$ monomials was used and $12$ closest nodes counted as support for each node in one setup and in another 5 Guassians on 5 suport nodes. After more than $250$ nodes of discretization in each dimension the method diverges, which is expected. The stability criterion for diffusion equation in two dimensions is $\Delta t \leq \frac{1}{4} \Delta x^2$, where $\Delta x$ is the spatial discretization step in one dimension. In our case, at $250$ nodes per side, the right hand side yields $\frac{1}{4}\cdot\frac{1}{250}\cdot\frac{1}{250} = 4\times 10^{-6}$, so our method is stable within the expected region.

Convergence with respect to number of time steps and comaprios between implicit and explicit solution

Timestep convergence.pngExplicit implicit diffusion comparison ver2.png

And 1/4 case, where we have mixed Neumann/Dirichlet boundary condition due to the symmetry together with some more weird domains, just to have some fun ...

Quarter diffusion.pngPoisson weird1.pngPoisson weird2.png

Convection Diffusion

The following example problem is adapted from Ferziger & Perič (2002) (pages 82-86).

Screenshot 2016-11-28 11-05-03.png

We now consider the problem of a scalar quantity transported in a known velocity field $\b{v}$. The velocity field is given by \[\b{u} = (u_x,u_y) = (x, -y),\] which represents the flow near a stagnation point $(x,y) = (0,0)$. The streamlines $xy=\mathrm{const.}$ and change direction with respect to the Cartesian grid. The convection-diffusion equation (also known as the scalar transport equation) is to be solved with the following boundary conditions:

  • $u = 0$ along the north (inlet) boundary;
  • linear variation $u= (1 - y)$ along the west boundary ($x = 0$);
  • symmetry condition on the south boundary;
  • zero gradient at the east (outlet) boundary.

The parameter $\alpha$ is the diffusivity for the scalar quantity $u$. The problem and boundary conditions are schematically represented in below figure together with The solutions obtained by Ferziger and Perić.

Screenshot 2016-11-28 11-07-44.png Fvm convection.png

The meshless solution is obtained on regular point arrangements of sizes 100 × 100 and 300 × 300, for the 2 cases of diffusivity $\alpha = 0.01$ and $\alpha = 0.001$, respectively. For comparison we have plotted the contour lines at the same intervals as the original authors of this example. The basis functions are the 5 monomials $1$, $x$, $y$, $x^2$, $y^2$.

Electrostatics Poisson's equation

A special case of convection diffusion equation is also a Poisson's equation. Our next example is taken from the FreeFem++ manual (page 235).

Assuming there is no current and the charge distribution is time independent, the electric field $\b{E}$ satisfies \begin{equation}\label{eq:electrostatics} \b{\nabla}\cdot\b{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon}, \quad \b{\nabla} \times \b{E} = 0 \end{equation} where $\rho$ is the charge density and $\epsilon$ is the permittivity. If we introduce an electrostatics potential $\phi$ such that \begin{equation} \b{E} = -\b{\nabla}\phi, \end{equation} we can insert it into the first equation in (\ref{eq:electrostatics}) resulting in Poisson's equation \begin{equation}\label{eq:poisson} \b{\nabla}^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\epsilon}. \end{equation} In the absence of unpaired electric charge equation (\ref{eq:poisson}) becomes Laplace's equation \begin{equation} \b{\nabla}^2 \phi = 0 \end{equation}

We now solve this equation for a circular enclosure with two rectangular holes. The boundary of the circular enclosure is held at constant potential $0$ V. The two rectangular holes are held at constant potentials $+1$ V and $-1$ V, respectively.


Electrostatics.png

3D cases

First, the behavior of the method is tested on the regular case. The equation $\nabla^2 u = -\pi^2 \sin(\pi x) \sin(\pi y) \sin(\pi z)$ is solved on domain $[0, 1/2]^3$, where sides with at least one coordinate 0 have Dirichet BCs $u = 0$ and other sides have Neumann conditions $\frac{\partial u}{\partial \vec{n}} = 0$. The convergence of MLSM in two different setups is shown below. Max error is taken for error measure.

Pois3d neu poiss.png


And few more 3D cases that are not part of any serious analysis and were made only for fun.

A 3-dimensional example, where a CAD model for aluminium heat sink is discretized to obtain the domain description. Heat equation with $\alpha = 9.7 \cdot 10^{-5}$, with no heat generation, i.e. $q = 0$, with Dirichlet boundary conditions $u = 100 ^\circ C$ on the bottom surface and $u = 20 ^\circ C$ everywhere else.

Heat sink cad.pngHeat sink sol1.pngHeat sink sol2.png

Next, example is simulation of baking Beef Wellington, where we followed therecipe. The simple 3D model is discretized with 70490 points and simulated for one hour with 1 s time step. The initial temperature is set to 20 deg C, the oven temperature is set to 200 deg C. Heat diffusivity of beef is found in the literature, the dimensions are 34 x 14 x 9 cm.

Beef 1.pngBeef 3.pngBeef 2.png

And finally, steady state temperature profile of a triceratops and ... a box.

Triceratops.jpgDiffusion3d.png

We will add more serious 3D results as soon as we get motivated to prepare them, hopefully with some awesome project

References

  • Trobec R., Kosec G., Šterk M., Šarler B., Comparison of local weak and strong form meshless methods for 2-D diffusion equation. Engineering analysis with boundary elements. 2012;36:310-321; manuscript
  • robec R., Kosec G., Parallel Scientific Computing, ISBN: 978-3-319-17072-5 (Print) 978-3-319-17073-2.
  • Slak, J., Kosec, G.. Detection of heart rate variability from a wearable differential ECG device., MIPRO 2016, 39th International Convention, 2016, Opatija, Croatia, ISSN 1847-3938, pp 450-455.

This list might be incomplete, check also reference on the Main Page.