Difference between revisions of "Cantilever beam"

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Mehless Method implementation
Jump to: navigation, search
(Finite elements)
(Finite elements)
Line 50: Line 50:
 
== Finite elements ==
 
== Finite elements ==
  
[[File:cantilever_beam.png]]
+
[[File:cantilever_beam.png|800px]]

Revision as of 14:15, 14 November 2016

Do you want to go back to Solid Mechanics?

On this page we conduct numerical studies of bending of a cantilever loaded at the end, a common numerical benchmark in elastostatics.

Exact solution

The exact solutions to this problem is given in Timoshenko (1951) where it derived for plane stress conditions. Consider a beam of dimensions L \times D having a narrow rectangular cross section. The origin of the coordinate system is placed at (x,y) = (0,D/2). The beam is bent by a force P applied at the end x = 0 and the other end of the beam is fixed (at x = L). The stresses in such a beam are given as: \begin{equation} \sigma_{xx} = -\frac{Pxy}{I}, \end{equation}

\begin{equation} \sigma_{yy} = 0, \end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:sxy} \sigma_{xy} = -\frac{P}{2I}\left(\left(\frac{D}{2}\right)^2 - y^2 \right), \end{equation}
where I = D^3/12 is the moment of inertia.

The exact solution in terms of the displacements in x- and y- direction is \begin{align}\label{eq:beam_a1} u_x(x,y) &= -\frac{Py}{6EI}\left(3(x^2-L^2) -(2+\nu)y^2 + 6 (1+\nu) \frac{D^2}{4}\right) \\ \label{eq:beam_a2} u_y(x,y) &= \frac{P}{6EI}\left(3\nu x y^2 + x^3 - 3L^2 x + 2L^3\right) \end{align}

where E is Young's modulus and \nu is the Poisson ratio.

Numerical solution

For the numerical solution we first choose the following parameters:

  • Loading: P = -1000 N
  • Young's modulus: E = 3 \times 10^7 N/m2
  • Poisson's ratio: \nu = 0.3
  • Height of the beam: D = 12 m
  • Length of the beam: L = 48 m

The unloaded beam is discretized with 40 \times 10 regular nodes. Since the right end of the beam at x = L is fixed, the displacement boundary conditions are prescribed from the known analytical formulae (\ref{eq:beam_a1}) and (\ref{eq:beam_a2}) : \begin{equation} u_x(L,y) = -\frac{P}{6EI}\left(-(2+\nu)y^2 + 6 (1+\nu) \frac{D^2}{4}\right); \qquad u_y(L,y) = \frac{P}{2EI}(\nu L y^2) \end{equation}

The traction boundary at the left end of the beam (x=0) is given by (\ref{eq:sxy}): \begin{equation}\label{eq:trac_a} t_y(L,y) = -\frac{P}{2I}\left(\left(\frac{D}{2}\right)^2 - y^2 \right). \end{equation}

An indicator of the accuracy that can be employed is the strain energy error e: \begin{equation} e = \left[ \frac{1}{2} \int_\Omega (\b{\varepsilon}^\mathrm{num} - \b{\varepsilon}^\mathrm{exact})\b{C}(\b{\varepsilon}^\mathrm{num} - \b{\varepsilon}^\mathrm{exact}) d\Omega\right]^{1/2} \end{equation}

where \b{\varepsilon} is the strain tensor in vector form, \b{C} the reduced stiffness tensor (a matrix) and \Omega the domain of the calculated solution.

Finite elements

Cantilever beam.png