Difference between revisions of "Cantilever beam"

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Mehless Method implementation
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Do you want to go back to [[Solid Mechanics]]?
 
Do you want to go back to [[Solid Mechanics]]?
  
On this page we conduct numerical studies of the cantilever beam, a common numerical benchmark in elastostatics.
+
On this page we conduct numerical studies of '''bending of a cantilever loaded at the end''', a common numerical benchmark in elastostatics.
  
 
= Exact solution =
 
= Exact solution =
  
Consider a beam od dimensions $L \times D$ with the origin of the coordinate system at $(x,y) = (0,D/2)$. The left end of the beam is fixed and the right end of the beam is loaded with a vertical parabolic traction:
+
The exact solutions to this problem is given in Timoshenko (1951) where it derived for '''plane stress''' conditions. Consider a beam of dimensions $L \times D$ having a narrow rectangular cross section. The origin of the coordinate system is placed at $(x,y) = (0,D/2)$. The beam is bent by a force $P$ applied at the end $x = 0$ and the other end of the beam is fixed (at $x = L$). The stresses in such a beam are given as:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:trac_a}
+
\begin{equation}
t_y(L,y) = \frac{P}{2I}\left(\frac{D^2}{4}-y^2\right).
+
\sigma_{xx} = -\frac{Pxy}{I},
 +
\end{equation}
 +
\begin{equation}
 +
\sigma_{yy} = 0,
 +
\end{equation}
 +
\begin{equation}\label{eq:sxy}
 +
\sigma_{xy} = -\frac{P}{2I}\left(\left(\frac{D}{2}\right)^2 - y^2 \right),
 
\end{equation}
 
\end{equation}
The exact solution of this problem is available in (Timoshenko and Goodier, 1977) and can be summarized as follows. The displacements in $x$- and $y-$ direction are given by
+
where $I = D^3/12$ is the moment of inertia.
 +
 
 +
The exact solution in terms of the displacements in $x$- and $y-$ direction is
 
\begin{align}\label{eq:beam_a1}
 
\begin{align}\label{eq:beam_a1}
u_x &= -\frac{P}{6EI}\left(\left(6L-3x\right)x + \left(2+\nu\right)\left(y^2-\frac{D^2}{4}\right)\right) \\ \label{eq:beam_a2}
+
u_x(x,y) &= -\frac{Py}{6EI}\left(3(x^2-L^2) -(2+\nu)y^2 + 6 (1+\nu) \frac{D^2}{4}\right) \\ \label{eq:beam_a2}
u_y &= \frac{P}{6EI}\left(3\nu y^2(L-x) + (4+5\nu)\frac{D^2 x}{4} + (3L-x)x^2\right)
+
u_y(x,y) &= \frac{P}{6EI}\left(3\nu x y^2 + x^3 - 3L^2 x + 2L^3\right)
 
\end{align}
 
\end{align}
where $E$ is Youngs modulus, $\nu$ is the Poisson ratio and $I$ is the moment of inertia for a beam with rectangular cross section and unit thickness:
+
where $E$ is Young's modulus and $\nu$ is the Poisson ratio.
\[
 
I = \frac{D^3}{12}.
 
\]
 
  
 
= Numerical solution =
 
= Numerical solution =
Line 28: Line 33:
 
* Length of the beam: $L = 48$ m
 
* Length of the beam: $L = 48$ m
  
The unloaded beam is discretized with $40 \times 10$ regular nodes. Since the left end of the beam at $x = 0$ is fixed, the displacement boundary conditions are prescribed from the known analytical formulae (\ref{eq:beam_a1}) and (\ref{eq:beam_a2}) :
+
The unloaded beam is discretized with $40 \times 10$ regular nodes. Since the right end of the beam at $x = L$ is fixed, the displacement boundary conditions are prescribed from the known analytical formulae (\ref{eq:beam_a1}) and (\ref{eq:beam_a2}) :
 
\begin{equation}
 
\begin{equation}
u_x(0,y) = -\frac{P}{6EI}(2+\nu)\left(y^2 - \frac{D^2}{4}\right); \qquad u_y(0,y) = \frac{P}{2EI}(\nu L y^2)
+
u_x(L,y) = -\frac{P}{6EI}\left(-(2+\nu)y^2 + 6 (1+\nu) \frac{D^2}{4}\right); \qquad u_y(L,y) = \frac{P}{2EI}(\nu L y^2)
 +
\end{equation}
 +
The traction boundary at the right end of the beam ($x=0$) is given by (\ref{eq:sxy}):
 +
\begin{equation}\label{eq:trac_a}
 +
t_y(L,y) = \frac{P}{2I}\left(\frac{D^2}{4}-y^2\right).
 
\end{equation}
 
\end{equation}
The traction boundary at the right end of the beam ($x=L$) is given by (\ref{eq:trac_a}).
 
  
 
An indicator of the accuracy that can be employed is the strain energy error $e$:
 
An indicator of the accuracy that can be employed is the strain energy error $e$:

Revision as of 13:29, 14 November 2016

Do you want to go back to Solid Mechanics?

On this page we conduct numerical studies of bending of a cantilever loaded at the end, a common numerical benchmark in elastostatics.

Exact solution

The exact solutions to this problem is given in Timoshenko (1951) where it derived for plane stress conditions. Consider a beam of dimensions $L \times D$ having a narrow rectangular cross section. The origin of the coordinate system is placed at $(x,y) = (0,D/2)$. The beam is bent by a force $P$ applied at the end $x = 0$ and the other end of the beam is fixed (at $x = L$). The stresses in such a beam are given as: \begin{equation} \sigma_{xx} = -\frac{Pxy}{I}, \end{equation} \begin{equation} \sigma_{yy} = 0, \end{equation} \begin{equation}\label{eq:sxy} \sigma_{xy} = -\frac{P}{2I}\left(\left(\frac{D}{2}\right)^2 - y^2 \right), \end{equation} where $I = D^3/12$ is the moment of inertia.

The exact solution in terms of the displacements in $x$- and $y-$ direction is \begin{align}\label{eq:beam_a1} u_x(x,y) &= -\frac{Py}{6EI}\left(3(x^2-L^2) -(2+\nu)y^2 + 6 (1+\nu) \frac{D^2}{4}\right) \\ \label{eq:beam_a2} u_y(x,y) &= \frac{P}{6EI}\left(3\nu x y^2 + x^3 - 3L^2 x + 2L^3\right) \end{align} where $E$ is Young's modulus and $\nu$ is the Poisson ratio.

Numerical solution

For the numerical solution we first choose the following parameters:

  • Loading: $P = -1000$ N
  • Young's modulus: $E = 3 \times 10^7$ N/m2
  • Poisson's ratio: $\nu = 0.3$
  • Height of the beam: $D = 12$ m
  • Length of the beam: $L = 48$ m

The unloaded beam is discretized with $40 \times 10$ regular nodes. Since the right end of the beam at $x = L$ is fixed, the displacement boundary conditions are prescribed from the known analytical formulae (\ref{eq:beam_a1}) and (\ref{eq:beam_a2}) : \begin{equation} u_x(L,y) = -\frac{P}{6EI}\left(-(2+\nu)y^2 + 6 (1+\nu) \frac{D^2}{4}\right); \qquad u_y(L,y) = \frac{P}{2EI}(\nu L y^2) \end{equation} The traction boundary at the right end of the beam ($x=0$) is given by (\ref{eq:sxy}): \begin{equation}\label{eq:trac_a} t_y(L,y) = \frac{P}{2I}\left(\frac{D^2}{4}-y^2\right). \end{equation}

An indicator of the accuracy that can be employed is the strain energy error $e$: \begin{equation} e = \left[ \frac{1}{2} \int_\Omega (\b{\varepsilon}^\mathrm{num} - \b{\varepsilon}^\mathrm{exact})\b{C}(\b{\varepsilon}^\mathrm{num} - \b{\varepsilon}^\mathrm{exact}) d\Omega\right]^{1/2} \end{equation} where $\b{\varepsilon}$ is the strain tensor in vector form, $\b{C}$ the reduced stiffness tensor (a matrix) and $\Omega$ the domain of the calculated solution.

Finite elements