Toggle menu
71
399
28
3.6K
Medusa: Coordinate Free Meshless Method implementation
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Triple dielectric step in 1D: Difference between revisions

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Meshless Method implementation
BlazS (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BlazS (talk | contribs)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Back to [[Computational electromagnetics]].
== Case ==
<math>
<math>
\newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}
\newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}
\newcommand{\dpar}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}
\newcommand{\dpar}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}
</math>
</math>
== Case ==
A good starting point in the study of computational electromagnetics is a calculation of reflectance and transmissivity of a simple device. In this example, we will be studying device made of three dielectric layers with different dielectric constants. The layers are infinite and thus the problem simplifies to one dimension. We still need to differentiate between two different cases, the incident wave can be either $y$ polarized
A good starting point in the study of computational electromagnetics is a calculation of reflectance and transmissivity of a simple device. In this example, we will be studying device made of three dielectric layers with different dielectric constants. The layers are infinite and thus the problem simplifies to one dimension. We still need to differentiate between two different cases, the incident wave can be either $y$ polarized
\begin{equation}
\begin{equation}
Line 17: Line 17:
The problem for $z$-polarized incident light was solved with the medusa library using $N = 4001$ points and $\Delta t = dx/2c_0$. The simulation used a TFSF source that was located at $x = 0.1$, a Gaussian source that contained frequencies up to 2.5GHz was used. The plots below show a single step during the simulation and the transmissivity and reflectance of the device.
The problem for $z$-polarized incident light was solved with the medusa library using $N = 4001$ points and $\Delta t = dx/2c_0$. The simulation used a TFSF source that was located at $x = 0.1$, a Gaussian source that contained frequencies up to 2.5GHz was used. The plots below show a single step during the simulation and the transmissivity and reflectance of the device.


[[File:eps_step1d-main.png|800px]]
[[File:eps_step1d-mainEn.png|800px]]


[[File:eps_step1d-TR.png|800px]]
[[File:eps_step1dEn-TR.png|800px]]

Latest revision as of 09:04, 14 August 2020

Back to Computational electromagnetics.

Case

<math> \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon} \newcommand{\dpar}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}} </math> A good starting point in the study of computational electromagnetics is a calculation of reflectance and transmissivity of a simple device. In this example, we will be studying device made of three dielectric layers with different dielectric constants. The layers are infinite and thus the problem simplifies to one dimension. We still need to differentiate between two different cases, the incident wave can be either $y$ polarized \begin{equation} \dpar{H_z}{t} =- \frac{1}{\mu(r)}\dpar{E_y}{x}, \qquad \text{in} \qquad \dpar{E_y}{t} = -\frac{1}{\eps(r)}\dpar{H_z}{x}, \end{equation} or $z$ polarized \begin{equation} \dpar{H_y}{t} = \frac{1}{\mu(r)}\dpar{E_z}{x}, \qquad \text{in} \qquad \dpar{E_y}{t} = \frac{1}{\eps(r)}\dpar{H_y}{x}, \end{equation}

Results

The problem for $z$-polarized incident light was solved with the medusa library using $N = 4001$ points and $\Delta t = dx/2c_0$. The simulation used a TFSF source that was located at $x = 0.1$, a Gaussian source that contained frequencies up to 2.5GHz was used. The plots below show a single step during the simulation and the transmissivity and reflectance of the device.