Difference between revisions of "Radial basis function-generated finite differences (RBF-FD)"

From Medusa: Coordinate Free Mehless Method implementation
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 37: Line 37:
 
and written simply as $\w$.
 
and written simply as $\w$.
  
To determine the unknown weights $\w$, equality of~\eqref{eq:approx}
+
To determine the unknown weights $\w$, equality of \eqref{eq:approx}
 
is enforced for a given set of functions. A natural choice are monomials, which
 
is enforced for a given set of functions. A natural choice are monomials, which
are also used in FDM, resulting in the Finite Point Method~\cite{onate2001finite}.
+
are also used in FDM, resulting in the Finite Point Method \cite{onate2001finite}.
  
 
In the RBF-FD discretization the equality is satisfied for radial basis functions $\phi_j$.
 
In the RBF-FD discretization the equality is satisfied for radial basis functions $\phi_j$.
Line 71: Line 71:
 
The matrix $A$ is symmetric, and for some $\phi$ even positive
 
The matrix $A$ is symmetric, and for some $\phi$ even positive
 
definite. This and other approximation properties of RBFs are well
 
definite. This and other approximation properties of RBFs are well
studied and out of scope of this work~\cite{wendland2004scattered}.
+
studied and out of scope of this work \cite{wendland2004scattered}.
  
 
== Monomial augmentation ==
 
== Monomial augmentation ==
 
Using approximations that only contain RBF can lead to stability issues with
 
Using approximations that only contain RBF can lead to stability issues with
conditioning under refinement or failure to converge due to stagnation errors~\cite{flyer2016role}.
+
conditioning under refinement or failure to converge due to stagnation errors.
To improve accuracy and convergence, the approximation from section~\ref{sec:rbffd}
+
To improve accuracy and convergence, the approximation can be augmented with polynomials.
can be augmented with polynomials.
 
  
 
Let $p_1, \ldots, p_s$ be polynomials forming the basis of the space of $d$-dimensional
 
Let $p_1, \ldots, p_s$ be polynomials forming the basis of the space of $d$-dimensional
 
multivariate polynomials up to and including total degree $m$, with $s = \binom{m+d}{d}$.
 
multivariate polynomials up to and including total degree $m$, with $s = \binom{m+d}{d}$.
  
Since enforcing exactness of~\eqref{eq:approx}
+
Since enforcing exactness of \eqref{eq:approx}
 
for additional function would result in an overdetermined system, these additional constraints are
 
for additional function would result in an overdetermined system, these additional constraints are
enforced by extending~\eqref{eq:rbf-system-c}
+
enforced by extending \eqref{eq:rbf-system-c}
 
as
 
as
 
\begin{equation} \label{eq:rbf-system-aug}
 
\begin{equation} \label{eq:rbf-system-aug}
Line 115: Line 114:
 
Note that the equation $P^\T \w = \b \ell_p$ contains exactly exactness constraints for
 
Note that the equation $P^\T \w = \b \ell_p$ contains exactly exactness constraints for
 
$p_j$. However, the introduction of parameters $\lambda_j$
 
$p_j$. However, the introduction of parameters $\lambda_j$
causes~\eqref{eq:approx} to not be exact for $\phi_i$ anymore. In fact, is was
+
causes \eqref{eq:approx} to not be exact for $\phi_i$ anymore. In fact, is was
shown~\cite{flyer2016role} to be equivalent to the following constrained
+
shown to be equivalent to the following constrained
 
minimisation problem
 
minimisation problem
 
\begin{equation}
 
\begin{equation}
Line 125: Line 124:
 
and parameters $\b \lambda$ can be interpreted as Lagrangian multipliers.
 
and parameters $\b \lambda$ can be interpreted as Lagrangian multipliers.
  
Weights obtained by solving~\eqref{eq:rbf-system-aug}
+
Weights obtained by solving \eqref{eq:rbf-system-aug}
 
are taken as approximations of $\L$ at $\x_c$, while values $\b \lambda$ are discarded.
 
are taken as approximations of $\L$ at $\x_c$, while values $\b \lambda$ are discarded.

Revision as of 15:08, 27 June 2019

This page describes the computation of RBF-FD weight augmented with polynomials. See also Computation of shape functions and Meshless Local Strong Form Method (MLSM) for a more general discussion.

RBF-FD

$ \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\T}{\mathsf{T}} \renewcommand{\L}{\mathcal{L}} \renewcommand{\b}{\boldsymbol} \newcommand{\n}{\b{n}} \newcommand{\x}{\b{x}} \newcommand{\w}{\b{w}} \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon} \newcommand{\lap}{\nabla^2} \newcommand{\dpar}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}} $

Approximations of partial differential operators are the core of strong form meshless procedures. Consider a partial differential operator $\L$ at a point $\x_c$. Approximation of $\L$ at a point $\x_c$ is sought using an ansatz \begin{equation} \label{eq:approx} (\L u)(\x_c) \approx \sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i u(\x_i). \end{equation} Here $\x_i$ are the neighboring nodes of $\x_c$ which constitute its \emph{stencil}, $w_i$ are called \emph{stencil weights}, $n$ is the \emph{stencil size} and $u$ is an arbitrary function.

This form of approximation is desirable, since operator $\L$ at point $\x_c$ is approximated by a linear functional $\w_\L (\x_c)$, assembled of weights $\w_i$ \begin{equation} \label{eq:approx-vec} \L|_{\x_c} \approx \w_\L (\x_c)^\T \end{equation} and the approximation is obtained using just a dot product with the function values in neighboring nodes. The dependence of $\w_\L (\x_c)$ on $\L$ and $\x_c$ is often omitted and written simply as $\w$.

To determine the unknown weights $\w$, equality of \eqref{eq:approx} is enforced for a given set of functions. A natural choice are monomials, which are also used in FDM, resulting in the Finite Point Method \cite{onate2001finite}.

In the RBF-FD discretization the equality is satisfied for radial basis functions $\phi_j$. Each $\phi_j$, for $j = 1, \ldots, n$ corresponds to one linear equation \begin{equation} \sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i \phi_j (\x_i) = (\L \phi_j)(\x_c) \end{equation} for unknowns $w_i$. Assembling these $n$ equations for into matrix form, we obtain the following linear system: \begin{equation} \label{eq:rbf-system} \begin{bmatrix} \phi(\|\x_1 - \x_1\|) &\cdots & \phi(\|\x_n - \x_1\|) \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \phi(\|\x_1 - \x_n\|) &\cdots & \phi(\|\x_n - \x_n\|) \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} w_1 \\ \vdots \\ w_n \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} (\L\phi(\|\x-\x_1\|))|_{\x=\x_c} \\ \vdots \\ (\L\phi(\|\x-\x_n\|))|_{\x=\x_c} \\ \end{bmatrix}, \end{equation} where $\phi_j$ have been expanded for clarity. The above system will be written more compactly as \begin{equation} \label{eq:rbf-system-c} A \w = \b \ell_\phi. \end{equation} The matrix $A$ is symmetric, and for some $\phi$ even positive definite. This and other approximation properties of RBFs are well studied and out of scope of this work \cite{wendland2004scattered}.

Monomial augmentation

Using approximations that only contain RBF can lead to stability issues with conditioning under refinement or failure to converge due to stagnation errors. To improve accuracy and convergence, the approximation can be augmented with polynomials.

Let $p_1, \ldots, p_s$ be polynomials forming the basis of the space of $d$-dimensional multivariate polynomials up to and including total degree $m$, with $s = \binom{m+d}{d}$.

Since enforcing exactness of \eqref{eq:approx} for additional function would result in an overdetermined system, these additional constraints are enforced by extending \eqref{eq:rbf-system-c} as \begin{equation} \label{eq:rbf-system-aug} \begin{bmatrix} A & P \\ P^\T & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \w \\ \b \lambda \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \b \ell_{\phi} \\ \b \ell_{p} \end{bmatrix}\!\!,\ P = \begin{bmatrix} p_1(\x_1) & \cdots & p_s(\x_1) \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ p_1(\x_n) & \cdots & p_s(\x_n) \\ \end{bmatrix}\!\!,\ \b \ell_p = \begin{bmatrix} (\L p_1)|_{\x=\x_c} \\ \vdots \\ (\L p_s)|_{\x=\x_c} \\ \end{bmatrix} \end{equation} where $P$ is a $n \times s$ matrix of polynomials evaluated at stencil nodes and $\b \ell_p$ is the vector of values assembled by applying considered operator $\L$ to the polynomials at $\x_c$.

Note that the equation $P^\T \w = \b \ell_p$ contains exactly exactness constraints for $p_j$. However, the introduction of parameters $\lambda_j$ causes \eqref{eq:approx} to not be exact for $\phi_i$ anymore. In fact, is was shown to be equivalent to the following constrained minimisation problem \begin{equation} \min_{\w} \left(\frac{1}{2} \w^\T A \w - \w^\T \b \ell_{\phi}\right), \text{ subject to } P^\T \b w = \ell_{p} \end{equation} and parameters $\b \lambda$ can be interpreted as Lagrangian multipliers.

Weights obtained by solving \eqref{eq:rbf-system-aug} are taken as approximations of $\L$ at $\x_c$, while values $\b \lambda$ are discarded.